Washington and Kyiv have reached a framework agreement that includes access to rare earth elements, critical minerals, and other natural resources -- but without security guarantees -- as diplomatic moves to end Russia's war on Ukraine, which has entered its fourth year.
U.S. President Donald Trump confirmed on February 26 that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy will visit Washington, D.C., on February 28, as negotiations continue over the Ukraine’s mineral resources.
"President Zelenskyy is going to be coming on Friday, that is now confirmed," Trump stated during his first cabinet meeting.
However, Trump was noncommittal regarding American security guarantees for Ukraine, stating, "I’m not going to make security guarantees...very much. We're going to have Europe do that."
Instead, Trump suggested that a U.S. presence in Ukraine’s mineral sector would provide "automatic security," arguing that "nobody’s going to be messing around with our people when we’re there."
Calling the deal beneficial for both sides, he emphasized, "It’s a great deal for Ukraine too, because they get us over there and we’re going to be working over there. We will be on the land."
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer on February 26 again called for U.S. security guarantees for Ukraine to deter Russia. Starmer made the comment as he prepared to travel to Washington to meet with Trump.
Trump said earlier that Zelenskyy wants to come to Washington on February 28 to sign a "very big deal," which is widely expected to be the framework deal that has become front and center of talks between the two countries.
"What we're doing is now we're saying, look, we want to be secured," Trump said, without elaborating on details of the agreement.
"The American taxpayer now is going to get their money back, plus," he added.
When contacted by RFE/RL's Ukrainian service, the deputy prime minister's office as well as the Economy Ministry declined to comment about the progress of negotiations and the current state of the agreement.
Tomas Kopecny, the Czech government's envoy for the reconstruction of Ukraine, told RFE/RL he has seen the deal and while it does not give security guarantees "in the traditional sense," linking economic interests and foreign policy helps ensure the United States remains committed to Ukraine's well-being.
"It's a success of diplomatic negotiations for both countries," Kopecny said, calling it "reasonable, fair."
"The deal itself is basically a way how to make American enterprises and American business and American government interested in the reconstruction of Ukraine not only on paper, but also through concrete financial and investment schemes."
According to multiple news reports quoting unidentified sources in the Ukrainian government, the deal would cover the joint development of Ukraine’s critical minerals and other natural resources, such as oil and gas.
The reports also said the agreement was a framework for a broad economic deal that would include the exploitation of rare earth minerals and reconstruction.
U.S. Senator Adam Schiff (Democrat-California) criticized the transactional nature of the deal.
"Are we to be nothing except transactional now? We have no commitment to democracy. We have no commitment to our allies," Schiff said on CNN. "It’s all going to be about the money. That seems to be Donald Trump’ orientation. What a sad chapter of our history."
He sees Zelenskyy's trip to the the White House as a "difficult errand" in which the only thing in it for him is "trying to improve somewhat his relationship with this hostile U.S. president who seems so beholden to Vladimir Putin."
Schiff said Zelenskyy and Ukraine had sacrificed only to be reduced to having to come "hat in hand" to sign a deal after being pressured by their most important ally to give up something for nothing.
"It is really just tawdry, but it is what this administration has reduced our allies to," he told CNN, adding that millions of Americans probably are ashamed of the president because the United States has betrayed an ally and its principles.
When asked what Ukraine would receive in the deal, Trump cited $350 billion worth of aid he claimed the United States has already been provided to Kyiv and "military equipment and the right to fight on."
Gabrielius Landsbergis, who served as Lithuania’s foreign minister until December, told RFE/RL that the concept of such a framework agreement could serve as a lesson to Europe in how it approaches support for Ukraine, including helping Kyiv in its dealings with the United States.
"Too often EU leaders go to Ukraine with only strong worded declarations, but not with actual support," he said.
"The EU should be faster -- diplomatically, politically, financially. Ukraine is a EU candidate country and the EU could have offered technical assistance to assess if the U.S. offered deal is in the best interest of Ukraine."
The reports of agreement on the terms came less than a month after Trump said on February 3 that his administration was “looking to a do a deal with Ukraine to secure what we're giving them with their rare earth and other things."
His remarks sketched the bare outlines of a trade-off: U.S. aid, including the tens of billions of dollars in mostly military support that Washington has already provided, in exchange for access to critical minerals.
Since then, wrangling over a potential deal played into discussions at the February 14-16 Munich Security Conference and a starkly public exchange of criticism between Trump and Zelenskyy, who said he had rejected an initial U.S. proposal due in part to a lack of concrete security guarantees.
Russia Offers U.S. A Mineral Deal Of Its Own
On February 24, the three-year anniversary of Russia's full-scale war on Ukraine, Russian President Vladimir Putin abruptly added a new element to the transatlantic discussions about critical minerals in what looked like a bid to complicate the path toward a U.S.-Ukraine agreement. He chaired a high-level government meeting on rare earth metals and offered the United States a chance at joint exploration of Russia's own deposits, adding: "We undoubtedly have, I want to emphasize, significantly more resources of this kind than Ukraine."
Putin spoke after Trump hailed the possibilities for close U.S.-Russian economic cooperation in the event of a peace deal. He touched on a sensitive issue that is at the heart of his war against Ukraine and is likely to be a major bone of contention as efforts to end the war proceed, saying potential rare earth exploration deals could include deposits in Russian-occupied parts of eastern Ukraine, in the resource-rich region known as the Donbas.
On February 23, Ukrainian Deputy Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko told a news conference that “about $350 billion worth of these useful critical materials” are in Russian-occupied territory.
At 3.8 million metric tons, Russia's rare earth reserves are the fifth-largest in the world, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. The main Russian rare earth mining and production companies have been nationalized since the start of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine and are now controlled by Rosatom, the state nuclear company, which has strong ties with close Putin associate Mikhail Kovalchuk, RFE/RL's Russian investigative unit, Systema, reported on February 25.
Rare earths are a class of more than about 17 minerals -- among them yttrium, cerium, and lanthanum -- that are found in trace amounts throughout the Earth's surface. They're in increasing demand because of their use in products such as batteries, computers, smart phones, magnets, electric cars, and high-tech weaponry.
What Are Ukraine's Mineral Resources?
Ukraine says it has reserves of half the 50 minerals the United States deems "critical to the U.S. economy and national security" -- a broader category that includes lithium and titanium, among others -- and of more common mineral resources such as coal, iron ore, oil, and gas.
U.S. officials have said that the minerals deal would enhance Ukraine's security because the United States would want to protect its interests, but Zelenskyy has stressed that Kyiv needs strong and reliable security guarantees in the event of a cease-fire or peace deal.
In addition to concerns about security guarantees, the amounts the United States has mentioned have also caused consternation in Kyiv. Trump said earlier this month that he wanted “the equivalent of like $500 billion worth of rare earths,” and a new draft proposed by Washington after the rejection initially called for Ukraine to contribute to a U.S.-held fund until it reached that amount.
Zelenskyy has pointed out that American wartime aid so far has been far below $500 billion and that much of the money has gone to U.S. weapons producers. As of September, Congress had appropriated $174.2 billion in emergency supplemental funding for Ukraine-related purposes, with 64 percent of that going to the Defense Department and defense-related accounts, according to the Congressional Research Service.
The latest version of the agreement did not include a demand for $500 billion. The deal would “establish a fund into which Ukraine would contribute 50 percent of proceeds from the ‘future monetization’ of state-owned mineral resources, including oil and gas, and associated logistics,” and the fund would “invest in projects in Ukraine.”
The deal excludes revenue currently being generated from mineral resource extraction by state-owned companies, meaning Naftogaz and Ukrnafta, two of Ukraine's largest taxpayers.
The text of the deal is short on details but seems to imply untapped mineral resources, often referred to as "greenfield" projects. The development of greenfield projects can take many years as companies must first explore the resources and conduct environmental studies before commencing production if they are even economically viable.
"Mining projects have very long lead times. If it's a big project, you could be looking at 10 years before you are at full-scale projection," Ed Verona, a nonresident fellow at the Atlantic Council who previously worked for energy and mining companies, told RFE/RL.
Verona said the latest version of the deal appeared more favorable to Ukraine but said there are many questions that still need to be worked out, including whether there will be local content requirements and whether U.S. companies would be allowed to own controlling stakes in projects considered to be strategic.
"There is a whole lot of devil in the details," he said.
Existing EU-Ukraine Memorandum
Amid U.S.-EU tension over Russia and a Ukraine peace deal, the bloc offered Ukraine a competing resources deal during a visit to Kyiv by European Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen on February 24, the AFP reported.
"Twenty-one of the 30 critical materials Europe needs can be provided by Ukraine in a win-win partnership," AFP quoted the European commissioner for industrial strategy, Stephane Sejourne, as saying. "The added value Europe offers is that we will never demand a deal that's not mutually beneficial."
However, European Commission spokesman Thomas Regnier said on February 25 that there was "no proposal" from the EU, adding the bloc has had a partnership with Ukraine on critical minerals since a memorandum of understanding was signed in 2021.
Von der Leyen "reaffirmed [a] commitment to implement this memorandum of understanding and accelerate the work to strengthen our mutual benefit partnership," he said. "As you see, this is really here about cooperation with Ukraine and not about any sort of competition with the United States."
Speaking to RFE/RL on condition of anonymity, a senior EU official said he would be "surprised" if Von der Leyen and the European Commission "would want to challenge the U.S. on this."
